Feed Good is a reader built on the one part of social media that worked: the things you followed, newest first, and then nothing. Here is the idea behind it, and how to build yours.
Social media's original promise was simple, and it has been quietly withdrawn: a reverse-chronological feed of things you chose to follow. What replaced it ranks, injects, and measures — not because anyone set out to make it worse, but because a feed that ends is a feed you close, and a closed feed sells nothing.
The old primitive survived underneath, though. Nearly everything still publishes RSS: a YouTube channel does, so does a subreddit, a Mastodon account, a podcast, and most newspapers. Feed Good subscribes to those on your behalf and renders them as a media feed — rich cards, inline video and images, one column you can read with a thumb — rather than as the three-pane email client every RSS reader has been since 2004.
It is meant to feel like the thing you are leaving. It simply does none of the things you are leaving it for.
A reader is only ever as calm as the list behind it. Six habits, in the order they matter:
Not fifty. Every reader dies the same death: a subscription list built like a bookmark folder, full of everything you might one day want, until opening it costs an hour. Five sources whose absence you would notice is a feed you finish — and finishing is the entire point.
A channel URL, r/france, a @user@instance handle, or just lemonde.fr — the feed is discovered for you. Before you commit, you see three real, recent posts from it, so you are never subscribing to an opaque XML file on faith.
Following a podcast with ten years of episodes pulls all of them, but only the newest ten arrive unread; the rest go straight to the archive. Adding a source costs you one screen, not an afternoon.
The hairline down the left of the column fills as you scroll — that is how much of the session is left, which is the one number an algorithmic feed will never show you. When you reach the bear, you are done. The archive exists, but you have to ask for it.
The question is not whether a source is good. It is whether you read it. Anything you have scrolled past twice is noise wearing a subscription — unfollow it from Sources. Nothing is lost, and the feed gets shorter, which is the direction that matters.
A busy subreddit or a newswire will out-post ten blogs without trying, and quietly turn your column into its channel. If one name is on half the cards, that is a decision being made for you again. Drop it, or keep it knowing what it is.
That is the whole thing.
Sign in